The Big Ten & Penn State

There was so much Penn State talk on Thursday with the Freeh Report being released, and for good reason. A lot of writers around the country were weighing in and most every article I read talks about how the NCAA has to do something…something…as it relates to punishing Penn State.

Most don’t articulate what type of punishment, just that there HAS TO BE SOMETHING…and I agree with that. I think the NCAA set forth a foundation of what they would be looking at related to Penn State and this instance, way back in November.

The Freeh Report spoke to an environment lacking oversight, compliance and institutional control. For me, this is the worst case of all time as it relates to Lack of Institutional Control….or rather, the most controlling atmosphere where a sports program has operated outside the boundaries of local, state and federal law (Clery Act, lack of reporting, trying to handle things internally, making amazing judgements of ‘humane treatment’,etc).

The Freeh Report paints the picture that the ‘Big Four’ at Penn State, Paterno, Spanier, Schultz and Curley, made their decisions/inactions in order to not see their football program embarrassed or gain negative publicity.

To me, that has led to them having gaining an ‘unfair advantage’ by trying to avoid the negative fallout and all that could go along with it on the recruiting trail and program ‘prestige’ since 1998.

They allowed Sandusky to coach another year as Defensive Coordinator before his ‘retirement’, which in hindsight seems absolutely forced and due to the 1998 incident that went unreported, despite the Penn State police speaking to then PSU President Spanier about it. They paid Sandusky $168,000 in 1999 in a one-time, lump sum payment in addition to amazing ‘retirement’ benefits. They allowed Sandusky to continue to use the Penn State name and his nearly unfettered access to the program, facilities and trappings (bowl trips, etc) which allowed him to continue his predation of young boys.

In my opinion, they knowingly aided and abetted a serial pedophile.

If you are aware of such actions (1998 & 2001 incidents) yet do nothing about it, you are an accomplice. They didn’t even take the steps from entirely banning Sandusky him from the Penn State campuses. They buried their heads in the sand and kicked the can down the road, hoping the problem would go away and not suffer any embarrassment while never seeking out the 2001 victim, not even knowing his name. A complete and tragic failure.

While the ‘Big Four’ names here are no longer associated with Penn State and one of them is dead (Paterno), I think Penn State needs to be punished. An example has to be set. The institutional crimes that took place at Penn State cannot go unpunished by the NCAA. If you are going to slap Ohio State with a bowl ban over tattoos and an environment lacking in compliance, this has to ‘merit’ some punishment.

Louis Freeh said his team was in communication with the NCAA and Big Ten conference during their investigation, while not sharing details of the investigation as it was ongoing.

My hope there is that both organizations are considering all of their options as it relates to Penn State.

Penn State has tens of thousands of great fans, good people, people who are shocked, sickened and saddened by this. My guess is that the vast majority of them fall into all of those categories. Yet fair or not, those faces and stories are not the ones that emerged on Thursday.

The stories we read saw roses placed on Joe Paterno’s grave and the person doing so refusing to read or listen to the Freeh report as to not tarnish his memory of ‘Joe Pa’. There was someone who changed the channel in the PSU Student Lounge just as the Freeh Report TV coverage was about to begin.

There are still people who would bury their heads in the sand, just like the Big Four did, and hope the problem goes away if they close their eyes and click their heels enough times, whispering ‘There’s no place like Penn State. There’s no place like Penn State.”

Indeed, there may be no place like Penn State.

Penn State dedicated one officer to Clery Act compliance, yet that person received no training until 2007. Penn State failed to follow Clery Act regulations for the reporting of crimes of this nature while Spanier was the head of the NCAA Board of Directors. The Freeh report stated that Penn State has no centralized office, officer or committee to oversee institutional compliance as it relates to laws and legislation.

Complete and total lack of institutional control. Yet since we aren’t talking about buying recruits a meal when that shouldn’t happen, or since it’s not a $100 handshake or some rogue booster gone wild, some still assert that the NCAA can’t punish Penn State?

If the NCAA doesn’t do something, then it needs to be disbanded. Every other institution who is a member (which is all of them, and they are the ones who created the NCAA) needs to call for the dissolution of the NCAA at that point as it would prove itself nothing other than a kangaroo court.

I do believe the NCAA is going to punish Penn State in some way, shape or form. As to whether or not it will be ‘enough’ or what would classify as being ‘enough’, I don’t know.

The Big Ten will also need to consider its options, and I am guessing those conversations have taken place at the highest levels and for some time. Jim Delaney is a shrewd businessman and one of the most influential persons in the history of major college athletics. He also doesn’t suffer fools well or those who would go against ‘the family’, which in this case is the good name of the Big Ten.

It’s not yet time for the NCAA or the Big Ten to do anything other than continue to compile facts, wait until the criminal proceedings are finalized as it will relate to Spanier, Curley and Schultz. At that point, actions can then be taken.

Should the Big Ten consider removing Penn State from their conference? I think that should be considered as one option. It may sound like a drastic measure, but good heavens, these are drastic crimes. These are the worst things, ever.

In 1929, Iowa was suspended from the Big Ten for lack of faculty control of the athletic department. They were shortly reinstated but the football program was mocked for years after and played just one league foe, Purdue, in the 1930 season. This was for allegedly having a slush fund of around $4,000 used to pay players, something that pales in comparison to covering up and concealing the acts of a child rapist.

In December of 2011, the Big Ten released a statement related to Penn State and the issues at hand. I have added the complete statement at the bottom of this piece so that you can refresh your memory, but one of the items included was this line:

“It (the Big Ten) will reserve the right to impose sanctions, corrective or other disciplinary measures in the event that adverse findings are made in the areas of institutional control, ethical conduct and/or other Conference related matters.”

Well, I believe the Freeh Report has produced adverse findings related to the areas of institutional control and ethical conduct, don’t you?

Which is why I believe the Big Ten will also have a say in this before all is said and done. It may wind up being a rubber stamp of what the NCAA chooses to do. It’s too early to go nuclear with opinions directed at either entity because both are still gathering information and considering their options and there are still criminal cases to be heard and tried.

One aspect related to the Big Ten’s view of Penn State in light of the current situation that came to mind on Thursday is the impact to the Big Ten Network. While the Nittany Lions will not appear on the BTN for the first two months or so of the 2012 season, you have to wonder if the sales team inside the BTN offices is experience any sort of blowback from potential advertisers not wanting their name and products associated with Penn State?

If you think that is crazy thinking, you need only look back to last December and remember how a 9-3 Penn State football program was passed over by the Outback, Gator, Insight and Meineke Car Care bowls and landed in the Ticket City bowl. The Gator took a 6-6 Ohio State team embroiled in their own scandal over Penn State while the Insight took a seven-win Iowa team who had been to the bowl the year prior as opposed to taking Penn State.

My friend Steve Deace likened the Penn State situation to a Chernobyl effect, back in November of 2011. Chernobyl is still on the map, but it’s a ghost town and cannot be repopulated due to the catastrophe from the late 1980’s. Scott Dochterman of The Gazette tweeted at me on Thursday that Penn State has ‘the mark of the beast‘ now, meaning a taint that will not soon disappear or be forgotten.

I agree with both of them. For the next quarter century if not longer, when the name ‘Penn State’ comes up the first thing most people will think of will be the cover up of a child rapist in their midst…the disgrace of Joe Paterno and administrators…innocent at risk boys being raped and nobody doing anything about it to protect them.

To heck with 25 years; that mental imagery will last until until those of us who lived through this era are dead. How do you think that is going to play on Madison Avenue? Might that ultimately be a tipping point factor in what the Big Ten may do with Penn State?

Of course we can’t answer that right now, but that day of reckoning is going to come. Either for Penn State, or the ‘watchers on the wall’ whose decisions will reverberate throughout this conference for the next several decades as it decides what to do about Penn State.

December of 2011 Big Ten Statement re: Penn State

The Big Ten Presidents and Chancellors express their sincere concern for any harm done to innocent young victims and their families. Protection of our children is one of society’s most central responsibilities and institutions of higher education should be particularly vigilant. We are committed to examining our own institutions to assure that effective measures are taken to assure the safety of children on our campuses.

It has been approximately one month since the initial release of the Grand Jury report in the Penn State matter and a number of federal, state and institutional investigations have been launched. While it is premature to reach any conclusions regarding civil or criminal liability arising out of these events, there does appear to be sufficient information to raise significant concerns as to whether a concentration of power in a single individual or program may have threatened or eroded institutional control of intercollegiate athletics at Penn State.

As a result, the COP/C has determined that:

-It will gather and review the facts arising out of the allegations in the Grand Jury report that pertain to matters of institutional control, ethical conduct and/or other compliance related issues

-It will request from Penn State University and the NCAA that Big Ten legal counsel be allowed to participate in the investigations or reviews, as the case may be, being conducted by Penn State and the NCAA as pertain to these issues

-It will reserve the right to impose sanctions, corrective or other disciplinary measures in the event that adverse findings are made in the areas of institutional control, ethical conduct and/or other Conference related matters.

In addition, the COP/C discussed the imperative of maintaining the public’s trust in the integrity of its member institutions and, in earning and deserving this trust, the importance of asserting each institution’s control over its intercollegiate athletics programs. The COP/C recognized and acknowledged that from time to time its institutions have failed to maintain the proper control of their athletics programs and that whenever this occurs at one institution in the conference, due to the common bonds and shared values of the members of the Big Ten, each other member of the conference is impacted. Accordingly, the COP/C has directed the conference to initiate an immediate review of the fundamental issues and systems affecting intercollegiate athletics, including the serious issues relating to the institutional control of athletics. It intends for this review to lead to the consideration of a common set of “stress tests” or other criteria that could be applied by the conference to its member institutions (a) to insure that each member is responsible and accountable to the collective membership of the conference for the control and operation of its intercollegiate athletics programs as well as (b) to prevent anyone, whether a trustee, administrator, faculty member, athletic director, coach, booster or otherwise, from eroding the effectiveness of an institution’s practices and procedures designed to protect the institution’s integrity and control over its intercollegiate athletic programs. The COP/C intends for the review to be completed and for the proposed standards, stress tests and other criteria, along with the proposed enforcement procedures and penalties, to be presented to it for consideration at a special meeting to be held in spring 2012.

  • Cbancroft83

    Jon, Great overview of a very sickening situation. These Penn State officials (including Paterno) will forever be tainted with this complete lack of judgement in the name of not darkening the legacy of Paterno and the all-powerful Penn St football program. Those who are trying to give Paterno a pass in any sense are doing a great disservice to the young people who suffered because these guys were too busy hiding their heads in the sand!

    • 95Hawkeye01

      Does any reaction by B1G or NCAA have to come before the season starts? Hard to imagine the Penn State Night game this October in Kinnick right now, usually one of the best games of the year. If they ban them from football shouldn’t they do it soon so players and coaches have time to sign on elsewhere? I have been converted and now believe Penn State should get the Death Penalty based on their lack of institutional control, but I still feel bad for the innocent players/coaches affected by that decision.

  • Jeffbuck7

    I think the NCAA and The Family (I love that) need to do something fairly drastic. Never till I read Jon’s comments above did I think actual banishment from the conference was necessary, but he makes some good points about this, especially the point that it’s going to be Lord Knows How Long before the mere words “Penn State” lose this taint. With Penn State banished or not, this is damaging to the conference, really damaging. I don’t know how much good it will actually do to hammer Penn State, but not doing something really strong is going to really smell.

  • Dave R

    Get ND on the line….again

  • Tweeterhawk

    Great points and commentary as usual, Jon. I no longer think banishing Penn State from the conference or giving PSU football the death penalty is an extreme over-reaction. Those may be the appropriate actions to send the message that athletic (and academic) programs need to be sure they have the right priorities. I fear the NCAA and the Big Ten will be slow to reach that point; I believe it will be necessary for concerned individuals — regardless of whether they are sports fans or support a particular collegiate team — to exert as much pressure as possible on the NCAA and especially the Big Ten member presidents to deal with the evil that took place in Happy Valley, and the ensuing cover-up.

  • Grady

    Nothing severe will happen to Penn St. because the primary violators are all either dead or have already left the campus.  This was not a campus-wide issue that infected other athletic or academic aspects of PSU life, as far as we know, and  Penn St. will clean up its own mess.  Frankly, I’d be more concerned about almost every other BCS school at this point.  Loyalty is a dangerous, dangerous thing.  As tight-lipped as Bowlsby was and Ferentz is, you don’t think a similar thing could have happened at Iowa by trying to ease someone quietly out the door without anyone finding out about it??  That is, in fact, the most LIKELY scenario.  Iowa’s weight coordinator puts 13 kids in the hospital, possibly causing permanent physical damage to multiple youngsters…his punishment?  Awarded internal coach of the year, or something like that.  We see this kind of blind loyalty at all costs most commonly in the military, sports, business and politics.   It’s time for true leaders to make it clear:  values are more important than loyalty.  Period.

    • Savanus

      A medical condition from lifting weights compared to a sexual predator of children is absurd! Rhobo is not THAT uncommon, heck Oregon had a bout with it the year before. I know one of the athletes involved and he said that they were partying and didn’t hydrate the way they should have. Penn State harbored and all but helped a child rapist found guilty in our courts! They need punished in the worst way! The NCAA retro punishes schools all the time when the coaches/players are already gone. This goes way beyond those parameters. These are crimes against children that PSU turned a blind eye to. No PSU will get their reckoning no doubt. Money has no bearinghere. The B10 and the NCAA have a morel and ethical responsiblity and all the eyes of the sports world and beyond are on them. And they know it.

      • Jeffbuck7

        I agree with Savanus. There’s no comparison. Apples and oranges.

  • J J

    SMU did far less than PSU’s “shenanigans”….give the Nittany Lions a 2 year vacation from college football…

    • Hawkeye4ever

      Agree but more like 5 years if not forever but that won’t happen to much money invloved…. Joepa is gone but this mess we live on forever

  • Jongraves2120

    I don’t want them in the league anymore.  I’ve been saying that since this story was broken.  The Big Ten will be harmed by association both in reputation and financially if Paterno State remains in the league.  It really isn’t a hard decision to make.  I believe the decision is already mapped out.  If certain information comes to light.. then out.   We are almost there.  

  • Pingback: Should Penn St. Be Booted From the B1G? - Page 5()

  • jameskalina

    A a result of the release of the Freeh Report that provides additional facts I’m changing my position about Joe Paterno and Penn State’s football program.

    I agree something must be done to punish Penn State as an institution, understanding there are many, many innocent people that would be affected by the punishment.  This may be unfair to a lot of folks.  But what was fair to the victims by not reporting and supporting the crimes?  A punishment of some kind needs to be rendered, and it needs to be significant enough to send a message that such actions and inactions by an institution and employees of that institution will be severely dealt with.

    I think the Big Ten needs to take a serious look at expelling Penn State from the Conference.  The NCAA should consider major penalties against Penn State.  The “death penalty” should not be off the table. 

    I’m hopefull the Big Ten Conference and the NCAA will proceed with due diligence and timeliness to render significant punishments to Penn State.

    In my mind, anything less than 3 years probation by the Big Ten Conference and 3 years probation by the NCAA including loss of football scholarships, a ban on bowl games and restricted contacts with prospective recruits would be unacceptable.

    That said, I would have no problem with the Big Ten banishing Penn State from the Conference and the NCAA issuing Penn State the “death penalty”

  • Bruce Peterson

    I think the ultimate punishment, without affecting the athletes who did nothing wrong, would be for the Big Ten to disassociate themselves from Penn State.  Any penalty now by the NCAA would most likely affect the athletes more than any person or entity. Loss of scholarships & Bowl Bans are not going to cut it for this situation.  Getting booted out of a conference though would be unprecedented and would send a strong message to every program at any level that there are consequences for poor judgement and hiding these despicable acts.  The Big Ten cannot afford the public relations nightmare that has been created and needs to act swiftly like it did when they took Paterno’s name off the conference championship game trophy.  This would be the pefect time to get Notre Dame on board and turn the Big Ten into a powerhouse.  With these two timely moves the Big Ten would undo the burden of carrying Penn Sate while adding a first class university with a rich tradition and a strong following.           

  • I full agree with your opinion.  This is institutional harboring of a criminal, and should be punished as such.  Penn State should be suspended from playing football for 13 years, the number of years they harbored a criminal.  They should be asked to pay restitution.

    If they choose to to play football after 13 years, then they should be taxed heavily on football revenue.  Basically, for 13 years after the 13-year suspension, any revenue beyond  what is needed to operate a bare-bones college program should be donated to charity of the victim’s choosing.

    Penn State should be asked to take out full page ads in multiple national publications.  This ads should be very simple, and should simply state that they scrwed up and they are sorry.

    Number of people should be fired from their jobs, and NEVER be allowed to work in their field.  E.g., the head of the athletic program should not be allowed to ever work in the field of education or field of athletics.  If he wants to become an insurance salesperson, then fine.

    I would say that the Federal Government should go as far as using Eminent Domain and seize the football building and build a memorial in its place.

    The first and latter will ensure that Penn State won’t play football for 13 or more years.

    The above is only my opnion, and fair and square.

  • BillikenHawkeye

    I think you make a pretty persuasive argument for why the PSU football program should be suspended for a couple years. 

  • BillikenHawkeye

    Perhaps if PSU or the NCAA refuse to suspend the program for several years, perhaps schools like Iowa should simply refuse to play the football team for a period of years. Perhaps Iowa could administer a “mini” death penalty and simply forfeit this year’s game against Penn State. 

    Is this an extreme response? Yes, but it would also send a powerful message about the commitment of the University to its core values. 

    If a game must be played, perhaps Penn State game could be replaced by playing another Big10 team that was scheduled to play Penn State that also decided to forfeit their game against Penn State.

  • Dahlhawk81ff

    How bout we have a fundraiser for sexually abused children on the night we would have played Penn State on national TV.  See if we could get people interested in stopping a hugely unreported national tragedy as they would be at stopping an overprivilaged bunch of athletes from “happy valley”.   Sexual abuse ruins lives we should fill Kinnick and use the profits to help those who are affected.  Let Penn State heal, but not as a member of the Big Ten.

  • R Rockwell

    When the dirt comes out from under the rug.. it is time to take out the trash.

Latest News

  1. B1G Indy Lucas Oil Stadium Field

    May 29 Jon Miller

    Can ESPN Afford Big Ten Contract?>

  2. Iowa Baseball

    May 28 Jon Miller

    Hawkeyes Advance to B1G Baseball Title Game>

  3. Iowa Baseball

    May 26 Sean Neugent

    Iowa Upsets Top Seeded Minnesota>

  4. Akrum Wadley

    May 26 David Schwartz

    100 Days & Five Questions>

  5. Alphonso Soko

    May 25 Rob Howe

    Under-Radar Muscatine RB Gearing Up for Summer Showcases>