Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 65
  1. #1

    Another Lane Violation (Notre Dame)

    What a crock. Then they call an intentional foul??

  2. #2
    HN Legend Scooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Cedar Rapids, IA
    Posts
    2,118

    Re: Another Lane Violation (Notre Dame)

    Both valid calls.

  3. #3
    HN Legend jacknicholson's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Des Moines
    Posts
    11,118

    Re: Another Lane Violation (Notre Dame)

    Sir Charles Barkley calling the referees out for the call.....

    He is making sense, horse sense, that is.....

  4. #4

    Re: Another Lane Violation (Notre Dame)

    Quote Originally Posted by Scooter View Post
    Both valid calls.
    I didn't see the lane violation. he did not enter until the ball was well out of his hands. I paused it.

  5. #5
    HN Legend tm3308's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Corydon/Iowa City, IA
    Posts
    13,733
    Blog Entries
    5

    Re: Another Lane Violation (Notre Dame)

    Quote Originally Posted by H8IAST8 View Post
    What a crock. Then they call an intentional foul??
    That was a lane violation. You can't come in from behind the arc before the ball hits the rim.
    HawkeyeRyno's yearly assessment of Fran's recruiting:

    Really? Because judging by how many of Fran's top targets have committed elsewhere so far and Iowa has no commitments I'd say recruiting trail has been a struggle so far for Fran for the [insert current recruiting year] class.

  6. #6
    HN Legend Scooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Cedar Rapids, IA
    Posts
    2,118

    Re: Another Lane Violation (Notre Dame)

    It was the dude from behind the shooter that violated it.

  7. #7
    HN Legend HawkPrdatr40's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Owatonna, MN
    Posts
    6,143

    Re: Another Lane Violation (Notre Dame)

    Quote Originally Posted by Scooter View Post
    Both valid calls.
    Valid but I will disagree with the call at that point in the game. Barkley is right a game played that close for 40 minutes can't and shouldn't EVER be decided by an official, should be decided by the player. Hence the no call on the foul by the Creighton player today on the final shot.
    Last edited by HawkPrdatr40; 03-16-2012 at 10:33 PM.

  8. #8
    HN Legend jacknicholson's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Des Moines
    Posts
    11,118

    Re: Another Lane Violation (Notre Dame)

    I will talk to the Commissioner about this.....

  9. #9

    Re: Another Lane Violation (Notre Dame)

    Quote Originally Posted by tm3308 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by H8IAST8 View Post
    What a crock. Then they call an intentional foul??
    That was a lane violation. You can't come in from behind the arc before the ball hits the rim.
    ok, they said until its released. I paused it when the ball was half way to the rim and he was still behind the line though. very close.

  10. #10
    HN Legend jacknicholson's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Des Moines
    Posts
    11,118

    Re: Another Lane Violation (Notre Dame)

    Quote Originally Posted by HawkPrdatr40 View Post
    Valid but I will disagree with the call at that point in the game. Barkley is right a game played that close for 40 minutes can't and shouldn't EVER be decided by an official.
    Precisely......

    To end a hard fought game on a call like that is a disgrace.....

  11. #11
    HN Legend Scooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Cedar Rapids, IA
    Posts
    2,118

    Re: Another Lane Violation (Notre Dame)

    LOL What about the previous 39 mins where ND did not play well enough to close the game out. They were up 10 in the second half. Does all previous play no longer matter in the last minute?

  12. #12
    HN Legend tm3308's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Corydon/Iowa City, IA
    Posts
    13,733
    Blog Entries
    5

    Re: Another Lane Violation (Notre Dame)

    Quote Originally Posted by HawkPrdatr40 View Post
    Valid but I will disagree with the call at that point in the game. Barkley is right a game played that close for 40 minutes can't and shouldn't EVER be decided by an official, should be decided by the player. Hence the no call on the foul by the Creighton player today on the final shot.
    1. The no call in the Creighton game was good, because that was debatable. This wasn't.
    2. The game was decided by the player. If he'd kept his *** behind the line, there would have been no call.
    HawkeyeRyno's yearly assessment of Fran's recruiting:

    Really? Because judging by how many of Fran's top targets have committed elsewhere so far and Iowa has no commitments I'd say recruiting trail has been a struggle so far for Fran for the [insert current recruiting year] class.

  13. #13
    HN Legend Scooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Cedar Rapids, IA
    Posts
    2,118

    Re: Another Lane Violation (Notre Dame)

    A roll is a roll and a toll is a toll. If we don't get no tolls, we don't get no rolls.

  14. #14
    HN Legend HawkPrdatr40's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Owatonna, MN
    Posts
    6,143

    Re: Another Lane Violation (Notre Dame)

    Quote Originally Posted by tm3308 View Post
    1. The no call in the Creighton game was good, because that was debatable. This wasn't.
    2. The game was decided by the player. If he'd kept his *** behind the line, there would have been no call.
    Hack on the elbow is debatable? Oh you mean that a Division 1 player usually misses a 3 by 10 feet.. lol Okay!!

  15. #15

    Re: Another Lane Violation (Notre Dame)

    Quote Originally Posted by Scooter View Post
    A roll is a roll and a toll is a toll. If we don't get no tolls, we don't get no rolls.
    "We're refs(MANLY refs), we're refs in stripes... YES!..."

Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •